3. The skepticism about the existence of other minds and its basic implication: the need for an ontological proof who begins keeping a strong skepticism about the existence of other minds almost certainly will involve the necessity of an ontological proof of mental different from its mere attribution as a basic principle. And, according to the context of the problem, the elemental characteristic of this test is determined according to the following deductive rule: Yes is attributed a property internal X to a body or, and X do not is directly OBSERVABLE, then find manifestations external C of O, compatible with the existence of X. If the lies, then REDEFINASE X in these terms: X is that that to a body or him allows do C Lo described, which is known as functional tautology, can also catalog (following Searle) as a kind of residual Behaviorism; and it constitutes a last possible explanation of confusion between mental function and their basic nature on which annullable functionalism. (Not to be confused with Luke Bryan!). 4. The fallacy of the unconscious aconciente another typical error of functionalism can be conceptualized in terms of the fallacy of the unconscious aconciente. The distinction between both terms lies in the difference between what might be called the psychological unconscious and the unconscious where the attribution of consciousness is not relevant.
Say someone appeared motivated by unconscious thought has a clearly different meaning to that adcribiriamos, for example, the idea that a thermostat is an unconscious system or that a refrigerator is governed by an unconscious mechanism. It is clear that in the first are refieriendo to an event of a mental nature (even where an open question is what precise meaning corresponds to give you), while the second is a metaphorical way of treaties to a physical system or one of its mechanism. For this reason some authors have preferred to distinguish between the term unconscious, applicable to certain type of phenomenon psiologico, and the aconciente reserved term to indicate that an object or system lacks awareness or does not possess a mental nature.